Property developer Kyko Group has released performance figures for investment properties at its $150 million Mon Komo development in the bayside Brisbane suburb of Redcliffe.
According to Kyko, Mon Komo recorded average occupancy rates of 82 per cent from January to March for its 4.5 star short stay apartments, which are professionally managed by Oaks Hotels and Resorts.
Standing ocean-front, the Mon Komo development incorporates the short-stay Oaks apartment tower, a residential apartment tower and a beachside hotel.
Kyko said the property’s occupancy rates surpassed Oaks Hotels & Resorts’ Brisbane property portfolio by five per cent over the same three month period, emphasising the high demand for luxury oceanfront apartments in Redcliffe.
Kyko said owner investors earn up to seven per cent gross yield under Oaks Hotels & Resorts management.
The average nightly room rate over the past 12 months reached $171.26, with the peak season average during November and December recorded at $254 per night.
Oaks Hotels & Resorts Manager of Owner Contracts Scott Cunnington said Oaks Mon Komo investors can be confident their assets are being managed by one of Australia’s leading accommodation providers.
“We provide investors with an immediate and guaranteed investment return, which is paid monthly and is based on the apartment type, quality, location and prevailing market conditions,” Mr Cunnington said.
“We also offer a unique two-year performance undertaking agreement, which provides owners with a higher return on investment than the permanent rental market,” he said.
“Once a purchaser places their investment apartment in the property’s short-term letting pool, we will ensure it is maintained to the highest standards, with regular cleaning and routine maintenance scheduled and carried out by Oaks Hotels & Resorts.
“Purchasers also have the opportunity to enjoy stays in their apartment at their leisure.”
Mon Komo was developed by the Kyko Group in 2011.
Prices for Oaks Mon Komo apartments start from $285,000 and they are available to buy now for an immediate investment return starting at $345 per week.
7 Common GST Mistakes On Property
It’s great to see the property market in South-East Queensland going in the right direction. With that comes an upswing in volume of transactions and GST consequences to consider.
GST and property has always been a touchy area and the Australian Taxation Office have remained active and vigilant in identifying problem transactions.
With the market now moving in the right direction we thought it a good time to set out the most common mistakes we see in the market by developers and professionals. So, here are 7 Common GST Mistakes on Property:
#1. CHARGING GST ON PRE-EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PREMISES.
For some reason this continues to happen almost 15 years after GST was introduced. If a developer sells pre-existing residential premises there will be no GST effect [they are input taxed supplies]. This is despite the fact that the developer is GST registered and selling to another GST registered developer. To be clear this only applies to pre-existing houses, units, apartments, etc … not land that may happen to be in a residential area.
#2. FORGETTING TO AGREE THE MARGIN SCHEME IN THE CONTRACT.
While most developers are aware that selling under the margin scheme can save GST on sale it is still often left out of the contract in error. The only way to fix this problem is to go to the purchaser after settlement to agree the margin scheme was used. You then still have an additional step in asking the ATO to waive the normal requirement to have this agreed prior to settlement. If this doesn’t occur you have lost the full 1/11th in GST on sale.
[Tip – make sure you can use the margin scheme in the first place]
#3. CLAIMING GST ON A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BEING BUILT WHERE YOU INTEND TO HOLD THE PROPERTY.
No GST can be claimed where you intend to rent out a property for residential rent. This is the case even if you intend to sell the property as new residential premises within 5 years of construction.
[Tip – make sure you have considered the cash-flow effect of not being able to claim back GST on construction costs]
#4. FIRST TIME OR PRIVATE DEVELOPERS REGISTERING AUTOMATICALLY FOR GST TO CLAIM CREDITS BACK.
When you undertake a development you need to consider whether or not you should register or if you are required to be registered for GST for your specific development. If you are subdividing land that you have held for a long term for a capital purpose such as rental, then you might not need to register for GST. If you choose to register for GST when you’re not required to by law you could be giving a lot of profit away by unnecessarily paying GST on the sale of the development property.
[Tip – do the maths and seek advice on your personal circumstances]
#5. IF A PROPERTY IS USED COMMERCIALLY THEN IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY ATTRACT GST ON SALE.
This is another common misconception. Traditionally with GST the type of property tends to determine the GST treatment. In other words you should look at the property and understand what its normal form and function is. Don’t just look at how the property is used. This will mean many properties used in a commercial way may not actually be subject to GST.
[Tip – you normally shouldn’t be charging GST to a commercial tenant in this circumstance or claiming back GST credits]
#6. IF YOU HAVE CHARGED OR PAID GST WHERE YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE IS IT DIFFICULT TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT?
We have dealt with numerous circumstances on both sides of the fence where we have been able to get a much better GST result. In some cases the ATO has been actively engaged with to ensure a good outcome.
[Tip – it’s still easier and less costly to get it right up front prior to settlement]
#7. IT’S TOO HARD TO GO TO THE ATO TO GET A PRIVATE RULING ON GST.
This is not the case. GST and property tend to be one of the more common rulings the ATO are asked for. They also tend to be quick to resolve where you know what information is required to be provided up front. This is one way to deal with contentious GST matters under contract.
We see these types of mistakes happening all the time [along with many others]. But now over to you, leave your comments below and tell us what other GST mistakes you have experienced on property.
Queensland Says No New Taxes on Foreign Property Buyers in Bjelke Petersen-like Strategy
The Queensland government has ruled out introducing new taxes on foreign buyers of residential real estate.
They are the only state that actually monitors foreign investment, so were in the box seat to implement such a tax regime.
The rejection comes after the populist Victoria Labor government’s recent budget unveiled a new tax regime that will seek to tax foreign buyers and foreign owners.
Queensland has vowed not to follow Victoria’s lead and introduce any new taxes on foreign property investors.
Treasurer Curtis Pitt said Queensland welcomed foreign property investment.
“We’re ruling out any stamp duty surcharges for foreign investors who purchase a house in Queensland,” said Pitt.
“We’re also ruling out any land tax surcharge for foreign investors in this state.”
The Victorian state budget, revealed on Tuesday, included a 3%t stamp duty surcharge for homes from July and land tax increases of 0.5% from 2016 for offshore-based investors.
News Ltd reported Queensland executive director of the Property Council, Chris Mountford saying the action will strengthen Queensland’s position on the global investment map.
“In particular it creates a compelling case to invest in Queensland over Victoria.”
Nothing new for Queensland as that was how former premier Joh Bjelke Petersen saw the state into an upswing when Queensland didn’t have death duties like other states.
It was in 1977 when the Premier of Queensland Joh Bjelke Petersen abolished death duties and a wave of Australia’s elderly headed towards the Gold Coast with the high rise following as dying in Queensland became a tax avoidance scheme and Surfers Paradise became a retirement haven.
By JONATHAN CHANCELLOR via propertyobserver.com.au
Nearly two milllion negative gearing investors across Australia: ATO
Negative gearing property investors now total 1,967,260 across Australia, according to the ATO latest data.
That’s up from the 1,895,775 in the previous tax year, 2011-12.
There were 1,811,175 investors claiming rental income in the 2010-11 year.
The ATO has a investor rental video series on working out your tax correctly.
The statistics for the 2012–13 income year were sourced from 2013 individual income tax returns processed by 31 October 2014. The statistics are not necessarily complete.
This data is not representative of the total number of properties.
By JONATHAN CHANCELLOR
Education3 days ago
MP vows Petrie university campus will be a reality despite claims saying otherwise
Property Management3 years ago
7 Common GST Mistakes On Property
Education1 week ago
Mayor calls funding freeze a ‘stake in heart’ of regional university plan
Infrastructure2 weeks ago
Decision on horizon for key marina section of huge North Harbour development at Burpengary
Finance2 months ago
New postcode restrictions for home loans
Market Place1 month ago
CoreLogic figures reveal Moreton Bay region’s hottest real estate suburbs
Opinion5 days ago
Would Australian Households Be Better Off if We Ditch Negative Gearing?
Employment2 months ago
$4.5m Development Set To Expand North Lakes’ Thriving Local Business Community